Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028654›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2024

Medicare Payment for Opioid Treatment Programs.

Carter H Nakamoto, Haiden A Huskamp, Julie M Donohue, Michael L Barnett, Adam J Gordon, Ateev Mehrotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Insurance coverage and provision of opioid disorder treatment: Evidence from Medicare.Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carter H NakamotoDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Haiden A HuskampDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Michael L BarnettDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Adam J GordonProgram for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Informatics, Decision Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Research Support CoreP30DA035772 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Maureen T Stewart · 2015 to 2026
$11.3M
Telemedicine for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: NIDA Summer Research Internship ProgramR01DA048533 · NIDA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Haiden A Huskamp, Ateev Mehrotra · 2019 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035772NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Medicare began paying for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) at opioid treatment programs (OTPs) that dispense methadone and other MOUD in January 2020. There has been little research describing the response to this payment change and whether it resulted in more patients receiving MOUD or just a shift in who pays for this care. Objective: To describe how many and which Medicare beneficiaries receive care from OTPs and how this compares to those receiving MOUD in other settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included all patients receiving MOUD care identified in 2019-2022 100% US Medicare Parts B and D claims. Patients receiving care in an OTP who were dually insured with Medicare and Medicaid in the 2019-2020 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System were also included. Exposure: Receiving MOUD care in an OTP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparisons of 2022 beneficiaries treated in OTPs vs other non-OTP settings in 2022. Results: The share of Medicare beneficiaries treated by OTPs rose steadily from 4 per 10 000 (14 160 beneficiaries) in January 2020 to 7 per 10 000 (25 596 beneficiaries) in August 2020, then plateaued through December 2022; of 38 870 patients (23% ≥66 years; 35% female) treated at an OTP in 2022, 96% received methadone. Patients in OTPs, compared to those receiving MOUD in other settings, were more likely be 65 years and younger (65% vs 62%; P < .001), less likely to be White (72% vs 82%; P < .001), and more likely to be an urban resident (86% vs 74%; P < .001). When Medicare OTP coverage began, there was no associated drop in the number of dually insured patients with Medicaid with an OTP claim. Of the 1854 OTPs, 1115 (60%) billed Medicare in 2022, with the share billing Medicare ranging from 13% to 100% across states. Conclusions and Relevance: This study showed that since the initiation of Medicare OTP coverage in 2020, there has been a rapid increase in the number of Medicare beneficiaries with claims for OTP services for MOUD, and most OTPs have begun billing Medicare. Patients in OTPs were more likely to be urban residents and members of racial or ethnic minority groups than the patients receiving other forms of MOUD.

Indexed as

MedicareOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadone

Identifiers

PMID39028654
PMCPMC11259898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.