Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028585›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2024

A ghost moth olfactory prototype of the lepidopteran sex communication.

Rui Tang, Cong Huang, Jun Yang, Zhong-Chen Rao, Li Cao, Peng-Hua Bai, Xin-Cheng Zhao, Jun-Feng Dong, Xi-Zhong Yan, Fang-Hao Wan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rui TangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510260, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9313-0802
Cong HuangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6149-4989
Jun YangCollege of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Shanxi, 030801, China.
Zhong-Chen RaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510260, China.
Li CaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510260, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5936-4966
Peng-Hua BaiInstitute of Plant Protection, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300384, China.
Xin-Cheng ZhaoHenan International Laboratory for Green Pest Control, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Jun-Feng DongForestry College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, China.
Xi-Zhong YanCollege of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Shanxi, 030801, China.
Fang-Hao WanState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4275-8632
Nan-Ji JiangDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, D-07745, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4251-2795
Ri-Chou HanGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510260, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4120-3803

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515011366Major Science and Technology Project of Qinghai Province 2021-SF-A4-1National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2606900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex role differentiation is a widespread phenomenon. Sex pheromones are often associated with sex roles and convey sex-specific information. In Lepidoptera, females release sex pheromones to attract males, which evolve sophisticated olfactory structures to relay pheromone signals. However, in some primitive moths, sex role differentiation becomes diverged. Here, we introduce the chromosome-level genome assembly from ancestral Himalaya ghost moths, revealing a unique olfactory evolution pattern and sex role parity among Lepidoptera. These olfactory structures of the ghost moths are characterized by a dense population of trichoid sensilla, both larger male and female antennal entry parts of brains, compared to the evolutionary later Lepidoptera. Furthermore, a unique tandem of 34 odorant receptor 19 homologs in Thitarodes xiaojinensis (TxiaOr19) has been identified, which presents overlapped motifs with pheromone receptors (PRs). Interestingly, the expanded TxiaOr19 was predicted to have unconventional tuning patterns compared to canonical PRs, with nonsexual dimorphic olfactory neuropils discovered, which contributes to the observed equal sex roles in Thitarodes adults. Additionally, transposable element activity bursts have provided traceable loci landscapes where parallel diversifications occurred between TxiaOr19 and PRs, indicating that the Or19 homolog expansions were diversified to PRs during evolution and thus established the classic sex roles in higher moths. This study elucidates an olfactory prototype of intermediate sex communication from Himalaya ghost moths.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsFemaleMalePhylogenyReceptors, OdorantReceptors, PheromoneSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalReceptors, OdorantReceptors, PheromoneSex Attractantsgenomeghost mothLepidopteraneuroecologyolfactory evolutionsex role

Identifiers

PMID39028585
PMCPMC11258902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.