ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Identification and validation of screening models for breast cancer with 3 serum miRNAs in an 11,349 samples mixed cohort.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning approaches for cancer prognosis and diagnosis via non-coding RNA: a comprehensive review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Whole blood miRNA expression signatures as predictors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer.Hereditas · 2026Article
- Integrating circulating microRNAs with epidemiological factors enhances breast cancer detection across subtypes: the MCC-Spain study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Serum/glucose starvation enhances binding of miR-4745-5p and miR-6798-5p toNon-coding RNA research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe study focuses on enhancing breast cancer (BC) prognosis through early detection, aiming to establish a non-invasive, clinically viable BC screening method using specific serum miRNA levels.
methodsInvolving 11,349 participants across BC, 11 other cancer types, and control groups, the study identified serum biomarkers through feature selection and developed two BC screening models using six machine learning algorithms. These models underwent evaluation across test, internal, and external validation sets, assessing performance metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). Subgroup analysis was conducted to test model stability.
resultsBased on the three serum miRNA biomarkers (miR-1307-3p, miR-5100, and miR-4745-5p), a BC screening model, SM4BC3miR model, was developed. This model achieved AUC performances of 0.986, 0.986, and 0.939 on the test, internal, and external sets, respectively. Furthermore, the SSM4BC model, utilizing ratio scores of miR-1307-3p/miR-5100 and miR-4745-5p/miR-5100, showed AUCs of 0.973, 0.980, and 0.953, respectively. Subgroup analyses underscored both models' robustness and stability.
conclusionThis research introduced the SM4BC3miR and SSM4BC models, leveraging three specific serum miRNA biomarkers for breast cancer screening. Demonstrating high accuracy and stability, these models present a promising approach for early detection of breast cancer. However, their practical application and effectiveness in clinical settings remain to be further validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39028497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.