Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028484›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Decoding lower-limb kinematic parameters during pedaling tasks using deep learning approaches and EEG.

Cristian Felipe Blanco-Diaz, Cristian David Guerrero-Mendez, Rafhael Milanezi de Andrade, Claudine Badue, Alberto Ferreira De Souza, Denis Delisle-Rodriguez, Teodiano Bastos-Filho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristian Felipe Blanco-DiazPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil. cblanco88@uan.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8083-7454
Cristian David Guerrero-MendezPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.
Rafhael Milanezi de AndradeGraduate Program in Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.
Claudine BadueDepartment of Informatics, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.
Alberto Ferreira De SouzaDepartment of Informatics, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.
Denis Delisle-RodriguezEdmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neurosciences, Santos Dumont Institute, Macaiba, RN, Brazil.
Teodiano Bastos-FilhoPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo 285/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a neurological condition that usually results in the loss of voluntary control of body movements, making it difficult for individuals to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) integrated into robotic systems, such as motorized mini exercise bikes (MMEBs), have been demonstrated to be suitable for restoring gait-related functions. However, kinematic estimation of continuous motion in BCI systems based on electroencephalography (EEG) remains a challenge for the scientific community. This study proposes a comparative analysis to evaluate two artificial neural network (ANN)-based decoders to estimate three lower-limb kinematic parameters: x- and y-axis position of the ankle and knee joint angle during pedaling tasks. Long short-term memory (LSTM) was used as a recurrent neural network (RNN), which reached Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) scores close to 0.58 by reconstructing kinematic parameters from the EEG features on the delta band using a time window of 250 ms. These estimates were evaluated through kinematic variance analysis, where our proposed algorithm showed promising results for identifying pedaling and rest periods, which could increase the usability of classification tasks. Additionally, negative linear correlations were found between pedaling speed and decoder performance, thereby indicating that kinematic parameters between slower speeds may be easier to estimate. The results allow concluding that the use of deep learning (DL)-based methods is feasible for the estimation of lower-limb kinematic parameters during pedaling tasks using EEG signals. This study opens new possibilities for implementing controllers most robust for MMEBs and BCIs based on continuous decoding, which may allow for maximizing the degrees of freedom and personalized rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectroencephalographyLower ExtremityAdultAlgorithmsBicyclingBiomechanical PhenomenaBrain-Computer InterfacesFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs)Convolutional neural networks (CNN)Kinematic reconstructionLong short-term memory (LSTM)Lower-limb rehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.