ArticleSkeletal radiology2025
Radiomics based on multiple machine learning methods for diagnosing early bone metastases not visible on CT images.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can radiomics signatures and machine learning methods reinforce the revived role ofAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2026Article
- Preoperative stratification of Ki-67 proliferation index in intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma via tumor-halo radiomic phenotyping on biparametric MRI: a multicenter diagnostic model.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study utilizes [ MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively studied 63 patients with early bone metastasis from July 2020 to March 2023. The ITK-SNAP software was used to delineate early bone metastases and normal bone tissue in SPECT images of each patient, which were then registered onto CT images to outline the volume of interest (VOI). The VOI includes 63 early bone metastasis volumes and 63 normal bone tissue volumes. 126 VOIs were randomly distributed in a 7:3 ratio between the training and testing groups, and 944 radiomics features were extracted from every VOI. We established 20 machine learning models using 5 feature selection algorithms and 4 classification methods. Evaluate the performance of the model using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsMost machine learning models demonstrated outstanding discriminative capacity, with AUCs higher than 0.70. Notably, the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classifier exhibited significant performance improvement compared to the other four classifiers. Specifically, the model constructed utilizing eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) feature selection method integrated with KNN classifier achieved the maximum AUC, which is 0.989 in the training set and 0.975 in the testing set.
conclusionsRadiomics features integrated with machine learning methods can identify early bone metastases that are not visible on CT images. In our analysis, KNN is considered the optimal classification method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39028463What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.