ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Artificial intelligence-based joint attenuation and scatter correction strategies for multi-tracer total-body PET.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Realization of long axial field-of-view PET technology in the clinic and research environment.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Dual-view scout scans with deep learning for ultra-low dose attenuation correction in PET.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Generalizable CT-free PET attenuation and scatter correction via few-shot cross domain adaptation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Instrumentation Digital Twins in PET and SPECT Imaging: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Development of a population of digital brain phantoms for radionuclide imaging research in Parkinson's disease.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for Staging Suspected/Confirmed Lung Cancer: Results on the Surgical Cohort Within a Monocentric Prospective Trial.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-dose ungated CT is commonly used for total-body PET attenuation and scatter correction (ASC). However, CT-based ASC (CT-ASC) is limited by radiation dose risks of CT examinations, propagation of CT-based artifacts and potential mismatches between PET and CT. We demonstrate the feasibility of direct ASC for multi-tracer total-body PET in the image domain.
methodsClinical uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT datasets of [
resultsCZ-ASC, DL-ASC and FT-ASC showed comparable visual quality with CT-ASC for all tracers. CZ-ASC and DL-ASC resulted in a normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of 8.51 ± 7.32% versus 7.36 ± 6.77% (p < 0.05), outperforming NASC (p < 0.0001) in [
conclusionsCZ-ASC, DL-ASC and FT-ASC demonstrated the feasibility of providing accurate and robust ASC for multi-tracer total-body PET, thereby reducing the radiation hazards to patients from redundant CT examinations. CZ-ASC and FT-ASC could outperform DL-ASC for cross-tracer total-body PET AC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.