Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028438›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024

Multi-institutional questionnaire-based survey on online adaptive radiotherapy performed using commercial systems in Japan in 2023.

Hiraku Iramina, Masato Tsuneda, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Noriyuki Kadoya, Nobutaka Mukumoto, Masahiko Toyota, Junichi Fukunaga, Yukio Fujita, Naoki Tohyama, Hiroshi Onishi and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Linear accelerator selection: impact on feasibility dose-volume histograms and practicality in dose reduction for organs at risk during prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hiraku Iramina *Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Masato Tsuneda *Adaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkamotoAdaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriyuki KadoyaAdaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobutaka MukumotoAdaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiko ToyotaAdaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi FukunagaAdaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukio FujitaAdaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki TohyamaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Komazawa University, 1-23-1 Komazawa, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, 154-8525, Japan.
Hiroshi OnishiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-Shi, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Mitsuhiro NakamuraAdaptive Radiotherapy Working Group (ART-WG), QA/QC Committee, Japan Society of Medical Physics, Tokyo, Japan. m_nkmr@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K15844Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K15860Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 21EA1010Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 23EA1012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to conduct a survey on the current clinical practice of, staffing for, commissioning of, and staff training for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) in the institutions that installed commercial oART systems in Japan, and to share the information with institutions that will implement oART systems in future. A web-based questionnaire, containing 107 questions, was distributed to nine institutions in Japan. Data were collected from November to December 2023. Three institutions each with the MRIdian (ViewRay, Oakwood Village, OH, USA), Unity (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and Ethos (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) systems completed the questionnaire. One institution (MRIdian) had not performed oART by the response deadline. Each institution had installed only one oART system. Hypofractionation, and moderate hypofractionation or conventional fractionation were employed in the MRIdian/Unity and Ethos systems, respectively. The elapsed time for the oART process was faster with the Ethos than with the other systems. All institutions added additional staff for oART. Commissioning periods differed among the oART systems owing to provision of beam data from the vendors. Chambers used during commissioning measurements differed among the institutions. Institutional training was provided by all nine institutions. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first survey about oART performed using commercial systems in Japan. We believe that this study will provide useful information to institutions that installed, are installing, or are planning to install oART systems.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansJapanRadiotherapyRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical practiceCommissioningDaily replanningOnline adaptive radiotherapyQuestionnaire survey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.