Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028396›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2024

New insights into chronic inducible urticaria.

Melba Muñoz, Lea Alice Kiefer, Manuel P Pereira, Mojca Bizjak, Marcus Maurer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Update on occupational contact urticaria: a systematic narrative review.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Dupilumab in patients with cold urticaria: Results from a phase 3 trial.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  5. Sexual Dimorphism in Allergic and Mast Cell-Associated Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cold Urticaria: From Wheals to Anaphylaxis.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melba MuñozInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
Lea Alice KieferInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
Manuel P PereiraInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
Mojca BizjakDivision of Allergy, University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Marcus MaurerInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10178, Berlin, Germany. marcus.maurer@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is a group of long-persisting and challenging to manage diseases, characterized by recurrent wheals and angioedema induced by definite triggers. In this review, we address recent findings on CIndU pathogenesis, diagnosis as well as its treatment, and we discuss novel potential targets that may lead to the development of more effective therapies for CIndU patients. RECENT ADVANCES: Meaningful advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis have been reported in the last decades. Novel CIndU-specific patient-reported outcome measures enable a closer and better evaluation of patients. CIndU is a hard-to-treat disease that highly impairs quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. Provocation tests allow to diagnose CIndU subtypes. The only licensed and recommended treatment for CIndU are second generation non-sedating H1-antihistamines, which lack efficacy in many cases. Omalizumab off-label use has been assessed in all types of CIndU with overall good outcomes. Promising emerging therapies currently assessed in chronic spontaneous urticaria are paving the path for novel treatments for CIndU.

Indexed as

Chronic UrticariaOmalizumabAnti-Allergic AgentsHumansQuality of LifeUrticariaAnti-Allergic AgentsOmalizumabCholinergicColdDelayed pressureDermographismHeatIgEInducible urticariaMast cellProvocationSolarVibratory

Identifiers

PMID39028396
PMCPMC11297124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.