ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2024
Evaluation of genotype imputation using Glimpse tools on low coverage ancient DNA.
Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in methods to characterize archaic introgression in modern humans.Genome research · 2026Review
- High-quality Population-specific Haplotype-resolved Reference Panel in the Genomic and Pangenomic Eras.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Review
- The genomic footprints of migration: how ancient DNA reveals our history of mobility.Genome biology · 2025Review
- Pre-processing of paleogenomes: mitigating reference bias and postmortem damage in ancient genome data.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancient DNA provides a unique frame for directly studying human population genetics in time and space. Still, since most of the ancient genomic data is low coverage, analysis is confronted with a low number of SNPs, genotype uncertainties, and reference-bias. Here, we for the first time benchmark the two distinct versions of Glimpse tools on 120 ancient human genomes from Eurasia including those largely from previously under-evaluated regions and compare the performance of genotype imputation with de facto analysis approaches for low coverage genomic data analysis. We further investigate the impact of two distinct reference panels on imputation accuracy for low coverage genomic data. We compute accuracy statistics and perform PCA and f
Indexed as
Identifiers
39028337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.