Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028249›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2024

"Let's Chat!" Improving Emergency Department Staff Satisfaction with the Medication Reconciliation Process.

Kurt Schwieters, Richard Voigt, Suzette McDonald, Lori Scanlan-Hanson, Breanna Norman, Erin Larson, Alexis Garcia, Bo Madsen, Maria Rudis, Fernanda Bellolio and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kurt SchwietersMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Richard VoigtMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Suzette McDonaldMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Lori Scanlan-HansonMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Breanna NormanMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Erin LarsonMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alexis GarciaMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Bo MadsenMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Maria RudisMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Fernanda BellolioMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sara HevesiMayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients who stay in the emergency department (ED) for prolonged periods of time require verification of home medications, a process known as medication reconciliation. The complex nature of medication reconciliation can lead to adverse events and staff dissatisfaction. A multidisciplinary team was formed to improve accuracy, timing, and staff satisfaction with the medication reconciliation process. Methods: Between November 2021-January 2022, stakeholders were surveyed to identify gaps in the medication reconciliation process. This project implemented education on role-specific tasks, as well as a "Let's chat!" huddle, bringing together the entire care team to perform medication reconciliation. We used real-time evaluations by frontline staff to evaluate effectiveness during plan- do-study-act cycles and obtain feedback. Following the implementation period, stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey between June-July 2022, using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = very dissatisfied to 3 = very satisfied). We calculated the change in staff satisfaction from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Differences in proportions and 95% confidence intervals are reported. This study adhered to the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) and followed the Lean Six Sigma rapid cycle process improvement (define-measure-analyze-improve-control). Results: A total of 111 front-line ED staff (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, nurses) completed the pre-intervention survey (of 350 ED staff, corresponding to a 31.7% response rate), and 89 stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey (a 25.4% response rate). Subjective feedback from staff identifying causes of low satisfaction with the initial process included the following: complexity of process; unclear delineation of staff roles; time burden to completion; high patient volume; and lack of standardized communication of task completion. Overall satisfaction improved after the intervention. The greatest improvement was seen in the correct medication (difference 20.7%, confidence interval [CI] 6.3-33.9%, Conclusion: There is a steep learning curve to educate multidisciplinary staff on a new process and implement the associated changes. With goals to impact the safety of our patients and reduce negative outcomes, engagement and awareness of the team involved in the medication reconciliation process is critical to improve staff satisfaction.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMedication ReconciliationPatient Care TeamQuality ImprovementAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansJob SatisfactionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39028249
PMCPMC11254147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.