Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028129›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2025

Irreversible Electroporation for the Focal Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Kai Zhang, Jeremy Teoh, Gang Zhu, Chi-Fai Ng, Michel Suberville, Pilar Laguna, Jean de la Rosette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Active matter as the underpinning agency for extraordinary sensitivity of biological membranes to electric fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kai ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing United Family Hospital and Clinics, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-3619
Jeremy TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-2342
Gang ZhuDepartment of Urology, Beijing United Family Hospital and Clinics, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-4731
Chi-Fai NgS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-9646
Michel SubervilleDepartment of Urology, Pôle Saint Germain Centre Hospitalier de BRIVE, Brive la Gaillarde, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0589-6826
Pilar LagunaDepartment of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-4417
Jean de la RosetteDepartment of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye. j.j.delarosette@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-1763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIrreversible electroporation (IRE) is a promising alternative treatment for low-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. In this systematic review we aim to evaluate the safety profile and functional and oncological outcomes of this new technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus up to 24 August 2023. Nineteen studies were analyzed, including 12 prospective studies and 7 retrospective studies. A total of 1,452 patients underwent IRE as the sole primary treatment modality.

resultsThe in-field clinically significant prostate cancer rate was reported between 0%-15.6% in the repeat biopsy. The retreatment rate was reported from 8% to 36.6%. The 3 years failure-free survival was presented between 90%-96.8%. The post-operative pad-free rate ranged between 96.7%-100%. Greater heterogeneity exists considering the change in erectile function. The most common reported complications were urinary tract infection and hematuria. Major complications were rare.

conclusionsThese results underline that IRE achieves favorable oncological control with an excellent safety profile, in the meantime preserving patients' urinary and erectile function.

Indexed as

ElectroporationProstatic neoplasmsQuality of lifeSafetyTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID39028129
PMCPMC11937361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.