Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028116›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Genomic prediction of regional-scale performance in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) by accounting for genotype-by-environment variation and yield surrogate traits.

Neal W Tilhou, Jason Bonnette, Arvid R Boe, Philip A Fay, Felix B Fritschi, Robert B Mitchell, Francis M Rouquette, Yanqi Wu, Julie D Jastrow, Michael Ricketts and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Neal W TilhouDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5221-1809
Jason BonnetteDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Arvid R BoeDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57006, USA.
Philip A FayGrassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Temple, TX 76502, USA.
Felix B FritschiDivision of Plant Science & Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-6855
Robert B MitchellWheat, Sorghum, and Forage Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Francis M RouquetteTexas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Overton, TX 75682, USA.
Yanqi WuDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74075, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-6881
Julie D JastrowEnvironmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Michael RickettsEnvironmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5588-9340
Shelley D MaherUSDA-NRCS, E. "Kika" de la Garza Plant Materials Center, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA.
Thomas E JuengerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9550-9288
David B LowryDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8182-1059

Funding

Argonne National LaboratoryBiological and Environmental Research Program DE-SC0018409Great Lakes Bioenergy Research CenterOffice of Biological and Environmental Research DEAC02-06CH11357Office of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Switchgrass is a potential crop for bioenergy or carbon capture schemes, but further yield improvements through selective breeding are needed to encourage commercialization. To identify promising switchgrass germplasm for future breeding efforts, we conducted multisite and multitrait genomic prediction with a diversity panel of 630 genotypes from 4 switchgrass subpopulations (Gulf, Midwest, Coastal, and Texas), which were measured for spaced plant biomass yield across 10 sites. Our study focused on the use of genomic prediction to share information among traits and environments. Specifically, we evaluated the predictive ability of cross-validation (CV) schemes using only genetic data and the training set (cross-validation 1: CV1), a subset of the sites (cross-validation 2: CV2), and/or with 2 yield surrogates (flowering time and fall plant height). We found that genotype-by-environment interactions were largely due to the north-south distribution of sites. The genetic correlations between the yield surrogates and the biomass yield were generally positive (mean height r = 0.85; mean flowering time r = 0.45) and did not vary due to subpopulation or growing region (North, Middle, or South). Genomic prediction models had CV predictive abilities of -0.02 for individuals using only genetic data (CV1), but 0.55, 0.69, 0.76, 0.81, and 0.84 for individuals with biomass performance data from 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 sites included in the training data (CV2), respectively. To simulate a resource-limited breeding program, we determined the predictive ability of models provided with the following: 1 site observation of flowering time (0.39); 1 site observation of flowering time and fall height (0.51); 1 site observation of fall height (0.52); 1 site observation of biomass (0.55); and 5 site observations of biomass yield (0.84). The ability to share information at a regional scale is very encouraging, but further research is required to accurately translate spaced plant biomass to commercial-scale sward biomass performance.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenome, PlantGenotypePanicumBiomassGenomicsModels, GeneticPhenotypeQuantitative Trait, Heritableclimate changegenomic predictiongenotype by environmentswitchgrass

Identifiers

PMID39028116
PMCPMC11457067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.