ArticleMolecular medicine reports2024
CD8
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FBR-NDs: a ferroptosis-inducing nanocomplex for targeted breast cancer therapy via immune modulation and redox-responsive drug delivery.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Overcoming immunotherapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer: a critical review of mast cell plasticity, metabolic reprogramming, and organoid models.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple‑negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive and heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer that lacks expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, making it more challenging to treat with targeted therapies. The present study aimed to identify CD8+ T cell‑associated genes, which could provide insight into the mechanisms underlying TNBC to facilitate developing novel immunotherapies. TNBC datasets were downloaded from public databases including The Cancer Genome Atlas, Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium, and Gene Expression Omnibus. Candidate genes were identified integrating weighted gene co‑expression network analysis (WGCNA), differential gene expression, protein‑protein‑interaction network construction and univariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan‑Meier survival, multivariate Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed to evaluate the prognostic value of hub genes. Knockdown experiments, alongside wound healing, Cell Counting Kit‑8 and Transwell migration and invasion assays were performed. In total, seven gene modules were associated with CD8+ T cells using WGCNA, among which potassium channel tetramerization domain 5 (KCTD5) was significantly upregulated in TNBC samples and was associated with poor prognosis. KCTD5 expression inversely associated with infiltration ratios of 'Macrophages M1', 'Plasma cells', and 'γδ T cells', but positively with 'activated Mast cells', 'Macrophages M0', and 'Macrophages M2'. As an independent prognostic indicator for TNBC, KCTD5 was also associated with drug sensitivity and the expression of programmed cell death protein 1, Cytotoxic T‑Lymphocyte‑Associated Protein 4 (CTLA4), CD274), Cluster of Differentiation 86 (CD86), Lymphocyte‑Activation Gene 3 (LAG3), T Cell Immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM Domains (TIGIT). Knockdown of KCTD5 significantly inhibited viability, migration and invasion of TNBC cells
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.