Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39027921›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2023

ERCP-induced perforation: review and revisit after half a century.

Abdel Rahman A A Al Manasra, Zaid Mesmar, Tarek Manasreh, Hanan M Hammouri, Anas Husein, Khaled Jadallah, Mohammed Bani Hani, Niazy Abu Farsakh, Shatha K Shahwan, Doaa Al-Qaoud and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abdel Rahman A A Al ManasraDepartment of general surgery and urology, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Iribid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Zaid MesmarDepartment of general surgery and urology, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Iribid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-5475
Tarek ManasrehDepartment of general surgery and urology, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Iribid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-8550-4763
Hanan M HammouriDepartment of mathematics and statistics, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Anas HuseinDepartment of general surgery and urology, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Iribid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-2626-5210
Khaled JadallahDepartment of internal medicine, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Mohammed Bani HaniDepartment of general surgery and urology, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Iribid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Niazy Abu FarsakhDepartment of internal medicine, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Shatha K ShahwanDepartment of general surgery and urology, faculty of medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Iribid, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Doaa Al-QaoudDepartment of pediatrics, Faculty of medicine, The Hashemite university, Zarqa, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
Jehad FataftahDepartment of radiology, Faculty of medicine, The Hashemite university, Zarqa, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-0812-5695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure. We aimed to investigate ERCP-induced perforations at our institution and conduct a comprehensive review of literature on ERCP-induced perforations (EIP) since the introduction of this procedure as a therapeutic intervention. Methods: This was a case-control study, in which charts of all patients diagnosed with ERCP-induced duodenal perforation were reviewed and compared to a control group without perforation. Patient's sociodemographic and clinical data, including ERCP procedure-related data, were gathered. Results: A total of 996 ERCP procedures were performed; only 13 patients proved to have EIP. Obstructive jaundice was the most common indication for ERCP. The main predisposing factor was difficult cannulation (P = 0.003). In total, five patients required surgical treatment; the majority of them had type I perforation, whereas type IV was the most common in patients who were treated conservatively. The overall mortality rate was 15%, the surgical group had a slightly higher mortality rate. Conclusions: Fifty years after the introduction of ERCP for therapy, it remains an invasive procedure that carries significant morbidity and mortality, even in skilled hands or at high- volume units. Conservative management of perforation yields favorable outcomes in selected patients.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeIntestinal PerforationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCholedocholithiasisduodenal perforationERCPObstructive jaundiceStapfer classification

Identifiers

PMID39027921
PMCPMC11255546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.