ArticleSurgery open science2024
Enhancing surgical internship experiences: The potential of a supporting digital curriculum.
Article in Surgery open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Centralization of care jeopardizes interns' learning experiences and necessitates educational changes. Here we present the development and evaluation of a structured digital curriculum, offered in addition to the clinical internship, to address these challenges. Methods: The structured digital curriculum was implemented in a the VUmc/Amsterdam UMC surgical internship program in the Netherlands. The curriculum used a modular format built around a skill or clinical condition. Each module included background information, digital elements like e-learnings and interactive vlogs, and self-assessments. From April 1st to June 30th, 2022, we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation comparing interns' experiences between the conventional and digital curriculum through surveys and interviews. Results: Thirty-nine interns (28.1 %) completed the survey, 17 (24.2 %) from the traditional curriculum and 22 (31.9 %) from the structured blended curriculum. Results from the interviews triangulated and complemented survey results. Interns appreciated both curricula (course marks 7.4 ± 2.0 vs. 8.1 ± 1.1, Conclusions: Integrating a structured digital curriculum to support clinical internships provides interns with comprehensive, readily accessible knowledge, refines their understanding of clinical topics, and results in feelings of empowerment. The combination of clinical and digital education ensures adequate exposure to subjects vital for future doctors, even if clinical exposure is limited. Thus, using a structured digital curriculum prepares the intern and helps the internship program to adequately navigate future medical challenges. Key message: Centralization of care jeopardizes interns' learning experiences and necessitates educational changes. A structured digital curriculum can empower interns in this scenario by providing readily accessible knowledge which refines their understanding of clinical topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.