ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024
Factors associated with acceleration of clinical development for infectious diseases: a cross-sectional analysis of 10-year EMA registration data.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating mathematical modelling and artificial intelligence to combat emerging viral syndemics: A systematic review.New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- Development Timelines of Innovative Drugs in China: A 15-Year Cross-Sectional Analysis of Characteristics and Influencing Factors.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Global disparities in regulatory approval of prophylactic vaccines, 2005-2024.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Building a case for accelerated clinical development of drugs and vaccines - what are the driving forces?Globalization and health · 2026Article
- Making Advanced Therapies Affordable and Accessible: Two Strategic Approaches.Developing world bioethics · 2026Article
- Article
- Research ethics and integrity challenges in accelerated clinical trials, an interview study.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Developing New Drugs for the COVID-19 Emergency: Anatomy of the U.S. Response.Pharmacotherapy · 2025Review
- How long does it take to develop a new drug?The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials feature centrally in the development of drugs and vaccines to determine safety and efficacy. Clinical development can be slow and may have a duration of more than ten years. Global public health threats such as Ebola virus disease (EVD) and COVID-19 have demonstrated that it is possible to accelerate clinical trials while maintaining safety and efficacy. We investigated acceleration in clinical trials over the past decade and identified factors associated with acceleration for drugs targeting infectious diseases. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed of all medicinal compounds targeting infectious diseases that received marketing authorisation by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2012 and 2022. We calculated median clinical development time in years between the first phase 1 trial enrolment date and the authorisation date. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with shorter development times. Findings: Eighty-one trajectories were included. The median clinical development time was 7.3 years (IQR 4.4-12.3). The fastest times belonged to drugs and vaccines targeting COVID-19 (1.3 years, IQR 0.8-1.6), EVD (5.5 years, IQR 5.1-5.8), and Hepatitis A-E (5.5 years, IQR 3.9-8.2). Factors associated with shorter development times were outbreak setting (-5.4 years [95% CI, -8.2 to -2.6]), accelerated assessment status (-4.0 years [95% CI, -7.6 to -0.5]), and drugs with combined compounds (-2.7 years [95% CI, -4.9 to -0.4]). Interpretation: Clinical development time for infectious disease-related drugs and vaccines was relatively short, and outbreak setting and accelerated EMA assessment were associated with shorter development times. Funding: Amsterdam Public Health research institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.