ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Trend analysis of caesarean sections using modified Robson's classification in a teaching institution in Uttarakhand.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Contribution of AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) to Cesarean Section Within Robson Classification Group.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Globally, the rising caesarean section (CS) rate is of great concern as it is associated with increased maternal morbidity and mortality in subsequent pregnancies. It is essential to reanalyze the CS trend and curb the rising menace using a standardized uniform auditing system. This study aimed to analyze and evaluate the trend of CS using Modified Robson's Ten Group classification system (RTGCS) in a teaching institution in Uttarakhand. Methodology: This cross-sectional study from October 2022 to March 2023 included 260 women undergoing elective or emergency CS. Data on maternal demographics, obstetrics, labour, and fetal outcomes were recorded. Indications for CS were analyzed using modified RTGCS. Results: The overall CS rate for the study period at our hospital was 31.4%. The major contributors to CS were Group 2 (21.5%), Group 10 (21.5%), and Group 5 (20.7%), while Group 6 and Group 8 contributed 10% and 7.6%, respectively. Group 9 had the least share (1%) in the study population. The two main indications for which CS was performed were prior Lower Section Caesarean Section (LSCS) and fetal distress, contributing to 24.6% and 19.2%, respectively. CS for breech presentation was done in 16% of the total cases. Conclusion: Modified RTGCS is an easy and effective method for auditing CS, preventing unnecessary procedures, and improving maternal care. Its implementation is crucial in addressing the increasing prevalence of CS and ensuring better maternal and fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.