ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Effect of different endometrial preparation methods on pregnancy outcome of FET in women with a normal menstrual cycle.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the relationship between different endometrial preparations and pregnancy outcomes among patients with regular ovulatory cycles in order to find the best endometrial preparation methods in the freeze-thaw embryo transfer (FET) cycle. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study to investigate FET pregnancy outcomes in women who had a regular menstrual cycle, were younger than 35 years old, and underwent a modified natural cycle (mNC), ovulation induction (OI), or a hormone replacement treatment (HRT) cycle. A total of 1071 frozen cycles were included for analysis. Results: The implantation rate and live birth rate (LBR) in the OI group show a significant difference when compared to the mNC and HRT groups ( Conclusions: Endometrial preparation methods affect the LBR in women with a regular menstrual cycle. The OI cycle had an advantage in the LBR of FET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.