Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39027789›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Designing Novel Endodontic Implants and Evaluation of the Stress Distribution in Maxillary Anteriors Using Finite Element Analysis.

Shruthi Rajagopal, Sonali Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shruthi RajagopalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Sonali SharmaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Endodontic implants, or didontic implants, offer a promising solution for stabilizing compromised teeth with a guarded prognosis and prolonging their clinical survival rate. Despite their potential benefits, they retired out of practice due to failures that arose from the lack of a biocompatible seal and engaging in dentin. Novel designs, based on evidence-based research with the help of bioceramics, present an opportunity to overcome these challenges and hence, enhance the clinical efficacy of endodontic implants. Thus the aim of this study is to design novel endodontic implants and evaluate their stress distribution in maxillary incisors using finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and methodology FEA is a biomechanical study to assess the stress distribution and extent of displacement to assess the clinical efficacy of novel endodontic implants in maxillary anterior teeth. Three 3D models (Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3) are designed to be meshed, and material elastic properties of the tooth and periapical tissues are applied. Boundary conditions were established, and a constant axial load value of 600 N was applied at a 45° angle. The FEA analysis was done under the loading conditions to assess the stress patterns for the three 3D models in comparison to the intact tooth on the ANSYS software (ANSYS Inc, Pennsylvania). Results FEA simulations revealed the distribution of stress within the tooth structure under functional occlusal forces, as Von Misses stresses were analyzed to assess the likelihood of material yielding and failure, which was comparable to that of an intact tooth. The maximum stress of deformation was as follows: intact: 1.7589e-5 MAX; Model 1: 3.3804e-6 MAX; Model 2: 2.638e-5 MAX; and Model 3: 2.1986e-5 MAX. The area of stress concentrations did not occur at the interface of the coronal or apical seal, which prevented catastrophic failures. Conclusion By leveraging advanced design principles and materials, these implants offer a promising alternative to traditional approaches, particularly in trauma cases with a poor prognosis for the survival of the teeth leading to loss of tooth. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate the efficacy and long-term success of these novel endodontic implants in diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

anterior fracturesbioceramicsendodontic implantfinite element analysis (fea)maxillary anterior teethtitanium

Identifiers

PMID39027789
PMCPMC11257767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.