ReviewCureus2024
Updates in the Management of Leg Length Discrepancy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Activity of Selected Bone Formation and Angiogenesis Markers During the Treatment of Limb Length Discrepancy in Children Using Distraction Osteogenesis with the Circular Hexapod External Fixator.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Limb Axis Disorder During Leg Length Discrepancy Treatment with Temporary Epiphysiodesis Using Eight-Plate Implants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to comprehensively investigate the recent literature on the management of leg length discrepancy (LLD). A thorough search of pertinent databases was done in order to find studies that satisfied the requirements for inclusion. A thorough search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct was conducted to find pertinent literature. Rayyan Qatar Computing Research Institute (QRCI, Ar Rayyan, Qatar) was utilized during the whole operation. Eight studies, including a total of 345 patients, were included in our data, and 206 (59.7%) of them were males. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis was the surgical intervention of choice in four studies. LLD can be effectively corrected by temporary and permanent epiphysiodesis. One study reported the incidence of angular deformities following temporary epiphysiodesis. Circumferential periosteal and dual tension-band plating significantly reduced LLD, but reported the incidence of an "over-shoot" in some patients. Bilateral motion control shoes and orthotic insole both were found to improve the patient's gait and trunk symmetry, evidenced by longer and faster steps, reduced ground impact at heel strike, and lower peak plantar pressure in both limbs. Our findings confirm that no inferences about the superiority of a particular management approach for the treatment of LLD can be made. The poor quality of the studies shows that more randomized control trials and prospective studies on the subject are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.