ArticleCureus2024
Unsupervised Machine Learning Reveals a Vulvodynia-Predominant Subtype in Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- System-level clustering of testosterone-related biomarkers identifies high-risk aging profiles linked to inflammation and renal function.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating vaginal laser therapy into multidisciplinary management of bladder pain syndrome and vulvodynia.BMC urology · 2026Review
- Unsupervised clustering analysis of treatment strategies for elite female athletes with severe stress urinary incontinence: focusing on competition return and SUI improvement.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Comorbid bladder pain syndrome and vulvodynia - a cross-sectional analysis of the UNICORN-4 study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Establishing Reference Values for Vaginal Vestibule Elastography in Healthy Postmenopausal Women.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is a chronic condition characterized by pelvic pain and urinary symptoms. Despite its significant impact on patients' quality of life, the heterogeneity of BPS/IC symptoms and the presence of comorbidities such as vulvodynia may not be adequately captured by validated questionnaires. Identifying vulvodynia in BPS/IC patients is crucial for providing appropriate treatment options. This study aimed to identify subtypes of BPS/IC patients using unsupervised machine learning and to investigate the prevalence of vulvodynia in each subtype. Methods We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 123 BPS/IC patients and 64 age-matched controls. Hierarchical clustering was performed using data from validated questionnaires, including the Numerical Rating Scale-11, Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI), Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI), Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency scores, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq SF), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20. The optimal number of clusters was determined using the elbow method, and the characteristics of each cluster were analyzed. All participants underwent a vulvodynia swab test to assess vulvodynia symptoms. Results Unsupervised machine learning revealed three distinct clusters of BPS/IC patients. Clusters 0 and 2 differed significantly, with Cluster 2 characterized by significantly higher vulvodynia scores compared to other clusters (P < 0.001). In contrast, Cluster 2 had lower bladder pain scores (ICSI and ICPI) and overactive bladder symptom scores (OABq SF and OABSS) compared to other clusters. Clusters 0 and 1 were characterized by a predominance of bladder pain and urinary frequency symptoms, with Cluster 0 exhibiting more severe symptoms. Conclusions Our study identified distinct subtypes of BPS/IC patients using unsupervised machine learning, with Cluster 2 representing a vulvodynia-predominant subtype. This finding, along with the potential of targeted therapies such as non-ablative erbium YAG laser for vulvodynia, underscores the importance of assessing extravesical symptoms, particularly vulvodynia, for the diagnosis and treatment of BPS/IC. A tailored approach, including laser therapy for vulvodynia-predominant patients, may be necessary for optimal management of BPS/IC. The vulvodynia swab test plays a crucial role in assessing vulvodynia symptoms, underlining the limitations of validated questionnaires in capturing the full spectrum of BPS/IC symptoms. A comprehensive evaluation of patients, including the vulvodynia swab test, is essential for accurate subtyping and management of BPS/IC. Further research with larger sample sizes and investigation of the relationship between identified subtypes and other clinical data is warranted to advance our understanding and management of BPS/IC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.