ArticleHeliyon2024
Identifying highly-valued bank customers with current accounts based on the frequency and amount of transactions.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We hypothesize that highly-valued bank customers with current accounts can be identified by a high frequency of transactions in large amounts of money. To test our hypothesis, we employ machine learning predictive models to real data, including 407851 transactions of 4760 customers with current accounts in a local bank in Jordan. Thus, we exploit three clustering algorithms: density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise, spectral clustering, and ordering points to identify the clustering structure. The two segments of customers (generated from the clustering process) have different transactional characteristics. Our customer behavioral segmentation accuracy is, at best, 0.99 and at least 0.82. Likewise, we build three classification models using our segmented data: a neural network, a support vector machine, and a decision tree. Our predictive models have an accuracy of 0.97 at best and 0.90 at least. Our experimental results confirm that the frequency and amount of transactions of bank customers with current accounts are most likely sufficient indicators for recognizing those customers whom banks highly value. Our predictive models state that the two most critical indicators are the deposit and withdrawal transactions performed on ATMs. In contrast, the least significant indicators are the transactions of credit cards and credit cheques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.