ArticleHeliyon2024
A novel clinical prediction model for in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients complicated by ARDS: A MIMIC IV database and external validation study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction models for the occurrence and mortality of sepsis-associated lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Codes in AI Prediction Models and Label Leakage of Same-Admission Clinical Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting fasciotomy requirement in lower extremity arterial injuries: a retrospective case-control study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting prognosis in sepsis patients with a history of cancer who were admitted to the intensive care unit.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Critical Gaps in ARDS Prediction Models: A Call for Clinical Pragmatism [Letter].International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis complicated by ARDS significantly increases morbidity and mortality, underscoring the need for robust predictive models to enhance patient management. Methods: We collected data on 6390 patients with ARDS-complicated sepsis from the MIMIC IV database. Following rigorous data cleaning, including outlier management, handling missing values, and transforming variables, we conducted univariate analysis and logistic multivariate regression. We employed the LASSO machine learning algorithm to identify risk factors closely associated with patient outcomes. These factors were then used to develop a new clinical prediction model. The model underwent preliminary assessment and internal validation, and its performance was further tested through external validation using data from 225 patients at a major tertiary hospital in China. This validation assessed the model's discrimination, calibration, and net clinical benefits. Results: The model, illustrated by a concise nomogram, demonstrated significant discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.711 in the internal validation set and 0.771 in the external validation set, outperforming conventional severity scores such as the SOFA and SAPS II. It also showed good calibration and net clinical benefits. Conclusions: Our model serves as a valuable tool for identifying sepsis patients with ARDS at high risk of in-hospital mortality. This could enable the implementation of personalized treatment strategies, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.