Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39027620›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A novel clinical prediction model for in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients complicated by ARDS: A MIMIC IV database and external validation study.

Ying Chen, Chengzhu Zong, Linxuan Zou, Zhe Zhang, Tianke Yang, Junwei Zong, Xianyao Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting fasciotomy requirement in lower extremity arterial injuries: a retrospective case-control study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.
Chengzhu ZongSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Linxuan ZouSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Zhe ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.
Tianke YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.
Junwei ZongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.
Xianyao WanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis complicated by ARDS significantly increases morbidity and mortality, underscoring the need for robust predictive models to enhance patient management. Methods: We collected data on 6390 patients with ARDS-complicated sepsis from the MIMIC IV database. Following rigorous data cleaning, including outlier management, handling missing values, and transforming variables, we conducted univariate analysis and logistic multivariate regression. We employed the LASSO machine learning algorithm to identify risk factors closely associated with patient outcomes. These factors were then used to develop a new clinical prediction model. The model underwent preliminary assessment and internal validation, and its performance was further tested through external validation using data from 225 patients at a major tertiary hospital in China. This validation assessed the model's discrimination, calibration, and net clinical benefits. Results: The model, illustrated by a concise nomogram, demonstrated significant discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.711 in the internal validation set and 0.771 in the external validation set, outperforming conventional severity scores such as the SOFA and SAPS II. It also showed good calibration and net clinical benefits. Conclusions: Our model serves as a valuable tool for identifying sepsis patients with ARDS at high risk of in-hospital mortality. This could enable the implementation of personalized treatment strategies, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

ARDSClinical prediction modelMortalitySepsis

Identifiers

PMID39027620
PMCPMC467048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.