ArticleHeliyon2024
Client satisfaction on family planning, its myths, and misconceptions among women in Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods design.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Woman-centeredness of family planning care and associated factors in a semi-urban health district in West Cameroon.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Exploring client satisfaction and determinants of family planning services at public health facilities in Debre Tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia: a mixed-method study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Client satisfaction has been recognized as an essential component in evaluating healthcare quality. In Wolaita Zone, there was a lack of research on the myths, misconceptions, and elements linked to client satisfaction with family planning. This study aimed to assess the myths and misconceptions of family planning and the factors associated with women's satisfaction with family planning services. Methods: We used a mixed methods study design (cross-sectional study design with a phenomenological design of the qualitative study). For the survey, 777 women were selected using multistage sampling, while purposive sampling was used to recruit in-depth interview participants. We used STATA version 15 and NVIVO version 12 software. Results: Only two-thirds, 534 (68.7 %) [95 % CI = 65.4%-71 %] clients, were satisfied with the family planning service. Clients who attended secondary education and above (AOR = 1.84; 95 % CI: 1.07, 3.23) and (AOR = 3.04; 95 % CI: 1.37, 6.72) did not wait to get the service (AOR = 5.11; 95 % CI: 1.98, 13.20), attended family planning service in a facility with convenient working hours (AOR = 4.43; 95 % CI: 2.25-8.74) and with posters in the waiting room (AOR = 3.48; 95 % CI: 1.22-9.94), comfortable with the cleanliness of clinic (AOR = 2.08; 95 % CI: 1.20, 3.94), whose Privacy was maintained (AOR = 9.56; 95 % CI: 5.02, 18.20), who were given information on the possible side effects of a method (AOR = 2.77; 95 % CI: 1.75-4.39), and on how the method works (AOR = 2.57; 95 % CI: 1.49-4.43 Conclusions: Client satisfaction in this study is low. An improved provider approach that suits on-site advocacy and the quality of counselling during the family planning service is needed. There is also a need to improve waiting time, working hours, cleanliness, awareness creation for both couples, and maintaining clients' privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.