ArticleHeliyon2024
AngioVac Procedures: Integration of cardiac surgeon and anesthesiologist-led transesophageal echocardiography: A preliminary report.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous Vacuum-Assisted Debulking of Infected and Non-Infected Left-Sided Cardiac Masses Using the AngioVac System: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports and Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Adaptability and Image Guidance to Address a Rare Pathology.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- What is new in cardiac anesthesia in 2024?Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The AngioVac system is a novel, minimally invasive, endovascular technique used to evacuate intravascular or intracardiac vegetation or thrombus. Although most AngioVac procedures are currently performed by interventionalists, this innovative procedure has been gaining attention among the surgical and anesthesia communities. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent the AngioVac procedure performed by a cardiac surgeon between August 2019 and December 2022. Fellowship-trained cardiac anesthesiologists operated TEE to navigate the AngioVac cannula during the procedure. The stored TEE images were retrospectively reviewed and independently analyzed by two cardiac anesthesiologists with specific focus on TEE-guided navigation of the AngioVac cannula towards the aspiration target. Results: Eleven patients underwent the AngioVac procedure during the study period. In nine cases, the majority of the vegetation or thrombus was successfully aspirated. In two cases, incomplete aspiration was attributed to the mass burden being too large, firm, and chronic in etiology. Worsening tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was identified in three of the 11 cases. Intraoperative TEE provided the cardiac surgeon with simultaneous display of the AngioVac cannula shaft, its tip, and aspiration target, as well as real-time assessment of TR, facilitating the minute movements essential for successful outcomes. Conclusions: This study details our experience and the effectiveness of the AngioVac system for treating soft, intracardiac vegetation or thrombus in a minimally invasive manner. Experienced cardiac anesthesiologists have the skillsets and knowledge to provide optimal live TEE imaging necessary for successful maneuvering of the AngioVac cannula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.