Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39027576›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Equilibrium bifurcation and extreme risk in the EU carbon futures market.

Junlong Mi, Xing Yang, Jiawen Li, Zhihua Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junlong MiEconomic School of Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510800, China.
Xing YangEconomic School of Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510800, China.
Jiawen LiEconomic School of Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510800, China.
Zhihua YangCollege of Economics of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the long-term memory and volatility clustering of the European Union (EU) Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA) futures returns, based on the economy-energy-environment system perspective and the assumption of investors' heterogeneity, this study proposes a joint modeling approach combining the fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model (FIGARCH) and the stochastic cusp catastrophe model (SCC) to examine the equilibrium bifurcations and extreme risks in the EU carbon futures market. The relevant results are threefold. (1) The SCC model has good fitting effect and interpretability, and is an effective method for investigating catastrophe reactions under time-varying volatility conditions. (2) In the EUA futures market, chartists are mainly affected by short-term price and trading volume changes, which leads to the emergence of equilibrium bifurcations, while fundamentalists make investment decisions based on the economy, the energy market, and market supply-demand, which affects the asymmetry of equilibrium bifurcations. (3) Using the catastrophe criterion (i.e., Cardan's discriminant of the equilibrium surface equation), we identify148 equilibrium bifurcation time points in the EUA futures market from December 3, 2009 to September 16, 2020, most of which are concentrated in two upward periods with an average scale of extreme risks is about 32.51 %. Our analysis provides theoretical support for regulatory authorities to stabilize the carbon futures market and build a collaborative extreme risk management framework covering energy and macroeconomics, also proposing suggestions for traders to effectively prevent extreme risks.

Indexed as

Carbon futures marketCatastrophe theoryEquilibrium bifurcationsExtreme risksInvestor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID39027576
PMCPMC11255852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.