ArticleHeliyon2024
Mineral content in commercially branded and local salt in selected villages from Bahi, Iramba, Manyoni, and Singida urban districts, Tanzania.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study examines the mineral content of table salts used by households in villages adjacent to the production areas. A total of 210 samples from commercial and local salts were collected, and analyzed using iodometry titration, spectrophotometry, colorimetry, and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) techniques, followed by a household interview for salt type preference. The lowest detectable concentration LOD, lowest quantifiable concentration LOQ and, recovery of methods ranged (0.32-2.155 μg/kg), (0.117-6.387 μg/kg) and, (94.2-103.6 %), respectively. Significant differences in mineral contents were observed within and between local and commercially branded salts (p < 0.001). The mean iodine in the local salt samples from Kitangiri (SA), Singidani (SB), Kindai (SC), Chibumagwa (SD), and Sulunga (SE) ranged from 10.5 ± 0,02 to 16.9 ± 0.01 mg/Kg, with only SA and SC in the World Health Organization (WHO) limits, while commercially branded salt samples SF (Malindi), and SG (Dar es salaam) ranged from 23.4 ± 0.01 to 35.9 ± 0,02 mg/kg that were in the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) and WHO agreed range. Other ions recorded were nitrate (3.3-4.4 mg/kg, 5.45-7.40 mg/kg), phosphate (0.02-0.48 mg/kg, 0.03 mg/kg), sulphate (0.31-0.42 mg/kg, 0.03-0.07 mg/kg), ammonia (0.5 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg to 0.6 mg/kg), copper (1.0-2.0 mg/kg, 0.9-2.0 mg/kg), iron (0.5-1.8 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg), and manganese (0.5-1.8 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg) for local and commercially branded salt, respectively. Households preferred local to commercial-branded salts: Nkonkilangi 163 (69.9, 32.1 %), Mangwanjuki 96 (17.2, 82.8 %), Unyanga 54 (26.7, 73.3 %), Chibumagwa 106 (63.0, 37.0 %), and Chali Igongo 51 (74.6, 25.4 %), respectively. Public health interventions are recommended to promote the consumption of adequately iodized salt for informed dietary choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.