ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Use of lung ultrasound to assess volume status and its association with physical examination in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Predictive Model Based on Cardio and Lung Ultrasound Features for Differential Diagnosis of Cardiogenic and Non-cardiogenic Dyspnea in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Single-Center Observational Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Observational
- Lung ultrasound: a complementary dynamic method to estimate target weight in pediatric hemodialysis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Multimodal Diagnostic Ultrasound for Congestion, Perfusion, and Ultrafiltration Tolerance in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The application of pleural ultrasound features in different lung diseases characterized by B-lines of lung ultrasound in hemodialysis patients.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Lung Ultrasound in Hemodialysis Patients-Which Protocol Is More Accurate and Informative in Daily Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Defining the optimal hydration status in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging, and the quest for an objective accurate method continues. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a well-validated technique to estimate volume status. Previous studies examining the relationship between LUS and physical examination demonstrated conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between LUS results and physical examination for assessing volume status in patients with CKD, and to compare different LUS protocols. Methods: A prospective, single-center trial correlating physical examination findings to LUS results in different CKD groups, including non-dialysis and dialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients were tested twice, before and after dialysis, to compare results with ultrafiltration volume. Different LUS protocols were performed and compared, including 16-, 12-, and 8-zone measurements. Results: We recruited 175 participants. A strong positive correlation was demonstrated between 16- and 12-zone protocols [ Conclusion: Most components of physical examination findings correlated with extravascular lung water assessment on LUS in CKD patients. The use of a simplified pragmatic LUS protocol may facilitate LUS use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.