Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39027308›Full record

ReviewChemical science2024

Synthetic and analytical considerations for the preparation of amorphous metal-organic frameworks.

Emily V Shaw, Ashleigh M Chester, Georgina P Robertson, Celia Castillo-Blas, Thomas D Bennett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily V ShawDepartment of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge 27 Charles Babbage Road Cambridge UK tdb35@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4186-7861
Ashleigh M ChesterDepartment of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge 27 Charles Babbage Road Cambridge UK tdb35@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-6651
Georgina P RobertsonDepartment of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge 27 Charles Babbage Road Cambridge UK tdb35@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-4356
Celia Castillo-BlasDepartment of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge 27 Charles Babbage Road Cambridge UK tdb35@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0048-5077
Thomas D BennettDepartment of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge 27 Charles Babbage Road Cambridge UK tdb35@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3717-3119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid porous materials presenting several tuneable properties, allowing them to be utilised for a wide range of applications. To date, focus has been on the preparation of novel crystalline MOFs for specific applications. Recently, interest in amorphous MOFs (aMOFs), defined by their lack of correlated long-range order, is growing. This is due to their potential favourable properties compared to their crystalline equivalents, including increased defect concentration, improved processability and gas separation ability. Direct synthesis of these disordered materials presents an alternative method of preparation to post-synthetic amorphisation of a crystalline framework, potentially allowing for the preparation of aMOFs with varying compositions and structures, and very different properties to crystalline MOFs. This perspective summarises current literature on directly synthesised aMOFs, and proposes methods that could be utilised to modify existing syntheses for crystalline MOFs to form their amorphous counterparts. It outlines parameters that could discourage the ordering of crystalline MOFs, before examining the potential properties that could emerge. Methodologies of structural characterisation are discussed, in addition to the necessary analyses required to define a topologically amorphous structure.

Identifiers

PMID39027308
PMCPMC11253190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.