ArticleJournal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry2024
Evaluation of clinical and serological responses after full-mouth implantation in single-visit versus multiple-session surgery.
Article in Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This research aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pain and wound healing and serological inflammatory markers after full-mouth implantation in one session compared to several sessions. Methods: A single-masked clinical trial was conducted on 20 patients (n=10) receiving full-mouth implants. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group was operated under general anesthesia in one session and the second group in multi-sessions. Inflammation level was evaluated through white blood cell (WBC) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) before and after surgery by a blood test. Pain and early wound healing (EHS) assessment was conducted after surgery with VAS and EHS indicators, respectively. Serological and clinical parameters were compared by repeated-measures ANOVA and Sidak and Man-Whitney U tests, respectively, using SPSS 20. Results: The CRP level 48 hours postoperatively was not different in the two groups; however, seven days after treatment, it was higher in the multi-session group than in the single-session approach. The WBC was not different between the two groups at evaluated intervals. Serum levels of WBC and CRP increased 48 hours postoperatively and decreased seven days later. EHS showed no difference between the two groups at the three investigated intervals. The amount of VAS 24 and 48 hours and 7 days postoperatively was higher in multi-session surgery than in the one-session approach. In both groups, VAS was not different at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively and decreased over seven days. Conclusion: Full-mouth implant surgery under general anesthesia in one session caused less inflammation and pain postoperatively while presenting the same wound-healing process as the multi-session surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.