ArticleTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Monkeypox-related ophthalmic disease.
Article in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Atypical mucocutaneous manifestations of MPOX: A systematic review.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Innovative Applications of Nanomaterials in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ocular Diseases: Targeted Delivery, Intelligent Therapy, Diagnostic Breakthroughs, and Synergistic Strategies with Stem Cells and Biomaterials.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Ocular Manifestations of Mpox and Other Poxvirus Infections: Clinical Insights and Emerging Therapeutic and Preventive Strategies.Vaccines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monkeypox (Mpox) is an acute febrile rash illness caused by the Mpox virus. The ongoing international outbreak since mid-2022 has spread worldwide, including Taiwan. Ocular involvement in Mpox infection is uncommon, including external and ocular surface lesions. Here, we describe a man who developed unilateral blepharoconjunctivitis and preseptal cellulitis, followed by the appearance of skin symptoms 6 days after the ocular manifestations. Samples taken from his oropharynx and skin lesions tested positive for the Mpox virus through a polymerase chain reaction test. He was hospitalized for isolation with topical lubricant, antibiotic, and acyclovir eye ointment until the skin lesions healed. However, on the day of discharge, punctate epithelial keratitis was observed in the same eye. The corneal lesion also tested positive for the Mpox virus. His keratitis progressed to dendritic ulceration, and treatment with tecovirimat was initiated. Initially, his corneal ulcer responded well to tecovirimat, but 12 days later, it deteriorated along with cells in the anterior chamber. To treat his condition, low-dose steroid and ganciclovir eye drops were administered. Eventually, the patient experienced resolution of the corneal lesion, leaving a scar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.