Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026971›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-radiomics in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Linyong Wu, Songhua Li, Shaofeng Li, Yan Lin, Dayou Wei

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linyong WuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Songhua LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Shaofeng LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Yan LinDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Dayou WeiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential significance of radiomics, derived from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in detecting deep stromal invasion (DOI), lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in cervical cancer (CC). Methods: A rigorous and systematic evaluation was conducted on radiomics studies pertaining to CC, published in the PubMed database prior to March 2024. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of each study were separately extracted to evaluate the performance of preoperative MRI radiomics in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM of CC. Results: A total of 4, 7, and 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis of DOI, LVSI, and LNM, respectively. The overall AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of preoperative MRI models in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM were 0.90, 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90); 0.85, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.82); 0.86, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.83) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.83), respectively. Conclusion: MRI radiomics has demonstrated considerable potential in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM in CC, positioning it as a valuable tool for preoperative precision evaluation in CC patients.

Indexed as

cervical cancerdeep stromal invasionlymphatic vascular invasionlymph node metastasisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39026971
PMCPMC11254676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.