Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026967›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Bayesian reinforcement learning for navigation planning in unknown environments.

Mohammad Alali, Mahdi Imani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad AlaliDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Mahdi ImaniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on a rescue mission problem, particularly enabling agents/robots to navigate efficiently in unknown environments. Technological advances, including manufacturing, sensing, and communication systems, have raised interest in using robots or drones for rescue operations. Effective rescue operations require quick identification of changes in the environment and/or locating the victims/injuries as soon as possible. Several techniques have been developed in recent years for autonomy in rescue missions, including motion planning, adaptive control, and more recently, reinforcement learning techniques. These techniques rely on full knowledge of the environment or the availability of simulators that can represent real environments during rescue operations. However, in practice, agents might have little or no information about the environment or the number or locations of injuries, preventing/limiting the application of most existing techniques. This study provides a probabilistic/Bayesian representation of the unknown environment, which jointly models the stochasticity in the agent's navigation and the environment uncertainty into a vector called the belief state. This belief state allows offline learning of the optimal Bayesian policy in an unknown environment without the need for any real data/interactions, which guarantees taking actions that are optimal given all available information. To address the large size of belief space, deep reinforcement learning is developed for computing an approximate Bayesian planning policy. The numerical experiments using different maze problems demonstrate the high performance of the proposed policy.

Indexed as

Bayesian decision-makingMarkov decision processnavigation planningreinforcement learningrescue operations

Identifiers

PMID39026967
PMCPMC11254700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.