Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026926›Full record

ArticleSimulation and synthesis in medical imaging : ... International Workshop, SASHIMI ..., held in conjunction with MICCAI ..., proceedings. SASHIMI (Workshop)2022

Brain Lesion Synthesis via Progressive Adversarial Variational Auto-Encoder.

Jiayu Huo, Vejay Vakharia, Chengyuan Wu, Ashwini Sharan, Andrew Ko, Sébastien Ourselin, Rachel Sparks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Simulation and synthesis in medical imaging : ... International Workshop, SASHIMI ..., held in conjunction with MICCAI ..., proceedings. SASHIMI (Workshop), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Harnessing Generative AI for Lung Nodule Spiculation Characterization.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Self-supervised brain lesion generation for effective data augmentation of medical images.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiayu HuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King's College London, London, UK.
Vejay VakhariaNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Chengyuan WuDivision of Epilepsy and Neuromodulation Neurosurgery, Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ashwini SharanDivision of Epilepsy and Neuromodulation Neurosurgery, Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andrew KoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sébastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King's College London, London, UK.
Rachel SparksSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148Wellcome Trust 218380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a novel minimally invasive treatment that is used to ablate intracranial structures to treat mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Region of interest (ROI) segmentation before and after LITT would enable automated lesion quantification to objectively assess treatment efficacy. Deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are state-of-the-art solutions for ROI segmentation, but require large amounts of annotated data during the training. However, collecting large datasets from emerging treatments such as LITT is impractical. In this paper, we propose a progressive brain lesion synthesis framework (PAVAE) to expand both the quantity and diversity of the training dataset. Concretely, our framework consists of two sequential networks: a mask synthesis network and a mask-guided lesion synthesis network. To better employ extrinsic information to provide additional supervision during network training, we design a condition embedding block (CEB) and a mask embedding block (MEB) to encode inherent conditions of masks to the feature space. Finally, a segmentation network is trained using raw and synthetic lesion images to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Experimental results show that our method can achieve realistic synthetic results and boost the performance of down-stream segmentation tasks above traditional data augmentation techniques.

Indexed as

Adversarial variational auto-encoderLaser interstitial thermal therapyProgressive lesion synthesis

Identifiers

PMID39026926
PMCPMC7616255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.