Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026912›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024

Ocular surface in patients with different degrees of myopia.

Yan-Yun Lyu, Shuang Wang, Xiao-Niao Chen, Zhen-Yu Wang, Shan-Shan Huang, Yan Yuan, Hong-Shuang Lu, Wen-Li Yang, Li-Ya Qiao, Lei Tian and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yan-Yun LyuTongren Eye Care Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.
Shuang WangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.
Xiao-Niao ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Third Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China.
Zhen-Yu WangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.
Shan-Shan HuangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.
Yan YuanBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.
Hong-Shuang LuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Wen-Li YangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.
Li-Ya QiaoBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.
Lei TianBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.
Ying JieBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the clinical features of the ocular surface in patients with different degrees of myopia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 122 participants with myopia in Beijing Tongren Hospital from February to June, 2023. After completing the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score scale, measurements were taken for refraction, biometric parameters and ocular surface parameters. The prevalence, severity and related parameters of the dry eye among different groups based on axial length (AL) were compared. Correlation analysis was performed between ocular surface parameters and refraction/biometric measurement parameters.

resultsStatistically significant differences were observed in refractive error, corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and subfoveal choroidal thickness among the groups (all

conclusionAL elongation is a risk factor for dry eye onset in myopic participants. The longer the AL, the more severe the dry eye is, with the increased CFS spots and tear film instability. Additionally, SE and AST exhibit negative correlations with dry eye symptom scores and ocular surface parameters.

Indexed as

axial lengthdry eyemyopiaocular surface

Identifiers

PMID39026912
PMCPMC11246949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.