Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026902›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024

Z-shaped incision without epithelial resection in pterygium surgery.

Satoru Kase, Shinki Chin, Susumu Ishida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. PentagonalInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satoru KaseDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Shinki ChinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Susumu IshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo introduce a novel surgical technique using a Z-shaped incision without epithelial resection in ophthalmic pterygia.

methodsThis was a prospective study. During pterygium surgery, all proliferative tissues were separated from the cornea and conjunctiva without resection of the tissues. The unaffected conjunctiva was incised in a Z-shape. The upper (or lower) conjunctival flap was sutured to the lower (or upper) normal conjunctiva on the limbal sclera, while the proliferative tissue was sutured to the upper conjunctiva (or lower) near the fornix.

resultsTen patients with pterygia were eligible for this study. Eight patients with primary pterygia and 2 with recurrent pterygia were included. The age of patients at surgery ranged from 47 to 90y (average: 71.9y). Five patients each showed right and left-sided pterygia. The postoperative follow-up periods were from 8 to 78mo (average: 25.0mo). The surgery was successfully conducted and wounds were favorably reconstructed in all patients. The proliferative tissues sutured to the normal conjunctiva showed palor and attenuated neovessles, and never showed re-growth after surgery. Nine patients did not show recerrence. Recerrent pterygium was noted in 1 patient, but additional treatments were not required.

conclusionThe procedure involves the reconstruction of pterygial tissue and normal conjunctiva using a Z-shaped incision. The scleral limbal wound can be covered with non-affected conjunctiva without any excision of conjunctival epithelia in patients with primary or recurrent pterygia.

Indexed as

non-resectionpterygium surgeryZ-shape

Identifiers

PMID39026902
PMCPMC11246943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.