ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Censored Least Squares for Imputing Missing Values in PARAFAC Tensor Factorization.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tensor factorization is a dimensionality reduction method applied to multidimensional arrays. These methods are useful for identifying patterns within a variety of biomedical datasets due to their ability to preserve the organizational structure of experiments and therefore aid in generating meaningful insights. However, missing data in the datasets being analyzed can impose challenges. Tensor factorization can be performed with some level of missing data and reconstruct a complete tensor. However, while tensor methods may impute these missing values, the choice of fitting algorithm may influence the fidelity of these imputations. Previous approaches, based on alternating least squares with prefilled values or direct optimization, suffer from introduced bias or slow computational performance. In this study, we propose that censored least squares can better handle missing values with data structured in tensor form. We ran censored least squares on four different biological datasets and compared its performance against alternating least squares with prefilled values and direct optimization. We used the error of imputation and the ability to infer masked values to benchmark their missing data performance. Censored least squares appeared best suited for the analysis of high-dimensional biological data by accuracy and convergence metrics across several studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.