Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026852›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Censored Least Squares for Imputing Missing Values in PARAFAC Tensor Factorization.

Ethan C Hung, Enio Hodzic, Zhixin Cyrillus Tan, Aaron S Meyer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ethan C HungComputational and Systems Biology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6306-9263
Enio HodzicDepartment of Bioengineering, UCLA, USA.
Zhixin Cyrillus TanBioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, UCLA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5498-5509
Aaron S MeyerDepartment of Bioengineering, UCLA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-1840

Funding

Systems Epigenomics of Persistent Bloodstream InfectionU19AI172713 · NIAID · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Michael R Yeaman · 2023 to 2026
$11.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI172713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tensor factorization is a dimensionality reduction method applied to multidimensional arrays. These methods are useful for identifying patterns within a variety of biomedical datasets due to their ability to preserve the organizational structure of experiments and therefore aid in generating meaningful insights. However, missing data in the datasets being analyzed can impose challenges. Tensor factorization can be performed with some level of missing data and reconstruct a complete tensor. However, while tensor methods may impute these missing values, the choice of fitting algorithm may influence the fidelity of these imputations. Previous approaches, based on alternating least squares with prefilled values or direct optimization, suffer from introduced bias or slow computational performance. In this study, we propose that censored least squares can better handle missing values with data structured in tensor form. We ran censored least squares on four different biological datasets and compared its performance against alternating least squares with prefilled values and direct optimization. We used the error of imputation and the ability to infer masked values to benchmark their missing data performance. Censored least squares appeared best suited for the analysis of high-dimensional biological data by accuracy and convergence metrics across several studies.

Indexed as

censored least squaresimputationPARAFACtensor

Identifiers

PMID39026852
PMCPMC11257416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.