ArticleRSC medicinal chemistry2024
Leveraging bounded datapoints to classify molecular potency improvements.
Article in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated drug design for druggable target identification using integrated stacked autoencoder and hierarchically self-adaptive optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Matched pairs demonstrate robustness against inter-assay variability.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Finding the most potent compounds using active learning on molecular pairs.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular machine learning algorithms are becoming increasingly powerful at predicting the potency of potential drug candidates to guide molecular discovery, lead series prioritization, and structural optimization. However, a substantial amount of inhibition data is bounded and inaccessible to traditional regression algorithms. Here, we develop a novel molecular pairing approach to process this data. This creates a new classification task of predicting which one of two paired molecules is more potent. This novel classification task can be accurately solved by various, established molecular machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost and Chemprop. Across 230 ChEMBL IC
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.