Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026578›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Cortical morphological networks for profiling autism spectrum disorder using tensor component analysis.

Kubra Cengiz, Islem Rekik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kubra CengizFaculty of Computer and Informatics, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Islem RekikFaculty of Computer and Informatics, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atypical neurodevelopmental disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) can alter the cortex morphology at different levels: (i) a low-order level where cortical regions are examined individually, (ii) a high-order level where the relationship between two cortical regions is considered, and (iii) a multi-view high-order level where the relationship between regions is examined across multiple brain views. In this study, we propose to use the emerging multi-view cortical morphological network (CMN), which is derived from T1-w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to profile autistic and typical brains and pursue new ways of fingerprinting 'cortical morphology' at the intersection of 'network neuroscience'. Each CMN view models the pairwise morphological dissimilarity at the connection level using a specific cortical attribute (e.g., thickness). Specifically, we set out to identify the inherently most representative morphological connectivities shared across different views of the cortex in both autistic and normal control (NC) populations using tensor component analysis. We thus discover the connectional profiles of both populations shared across different CMNs of the left and right hemispheres, respectively. One of the most representative morphological cortical attributes for assessing the abnormal brain structures in patients with ASD is cortical thickness. The most representative morphological connectivities in multi-view CMN population of normal control and ASD subjects, respectively, and in both left and right hemispheres within the temporal, frontal, and insular lobes of individuals with ASD. These representative connectivities are corresponded to specific clinical features observed in individuals with ASD.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderbrain connectivitycortical morphological networksmulti-view profilingtensor component analysis

Identifiers

PMID39026578
PMCPMC11254826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.