ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Identifying the high-benefit population for weight management-based cardiovascular disease prevention in Japan.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting gestational diabetes before conception for personalized interpregnancy weight management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular-disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death, and the association between obesity and CVD is particularly significant among women. Given the evidence highlighting the significance of weight-gain velosity, we aimed to elucidate its influence on cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), a reliable surrogate marker of CVD, and identify the high-benefit population where this influence is most pronounced. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study used electronic data from annual health checkups for workers in Japan. Individuals who voluntarily measured CAVI in 2019 were included, and weight-gain velosity was defined as the mean BMI gain from 2015 to 2019. Our primary outcome was the relationship between weight-gain velosity and CAVI. Results: Among 459 individuals, 53 had CAVI ≥ 9. Random forest analysis revealed that age was the most important factor, followed by lipid metabolism, weight-gain velosity, and glucose metabolism, with sex being the least important. Non-linear regression analysis of the effect of age on CAVI ≥ 9 showed the effect was pronounced after age 60, and the trend was greater in women. Among individuals aged 60 or younger, the aOR of weight-gain velosity for CAVI ≥ 9 was significantly positive (aOR 11.95, 95 %CI 1.13-126.27), while it was not significant for those older than 60. The relationship between weight-gain velosity and CAVI provides a new perspective on CVD risk factors. The effects of age, especially after 60, and weight-gain velosity in early- to middle-adulthood on arterial stiffness are emphasized. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of weight management under age 60, especially in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.