Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026452›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2025

Advances in metabolomics in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Swarnima Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Metabolic footprint of sepsis and septic shock: A narrative review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Multi-Omics and -Organ Insights into Energy Metabolic Adaptations in Early Sepsis Onset.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Metabolomics for the identification of biomarkers in endometriosis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Swarnima PandeyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in hospitalized patients. This condition has a complex pathophysiology and can swiftly progress to the severe form of septic shock, which can lead to organ dysfunction, organ failure, and death. Metabolomics has transformed the clinical and research topography of sepsis, with application to prognosis, diagnosis, and risk assessment. Metabolomics involves detecting and analyzing levels of metabolites in blood (plasma, serum, and/or erythrocytes) and urine; when applied in sepsis, this technology can improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and aid in better disease management by identifying early biomarkers. For this review article, "metabolomics," "sepsis," and "septic shock" were keywords used to search records in various databases including PubMed and Scopus from their inception until December 2023. This review article summarizes information regarding metabolic profiling performed in sepsis and septic shock and illustrates how metabolomics is advancing the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiagnosisMetabolomicsSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID39026452
PMCPMC12010799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.