Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026376›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Personality vulnerabilities and adverse event reporting in phase 1 clinical studies.

Joanna Skommer, Krish Gunesh, Thomas M Polasek

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna SkommerCMAX Clinical Research, 21 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. Joanna.Skommer@cmax.com.au.
Krish GuneshCMAX Clinical Research, 21 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. Krish.Gunesh@cmax.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4091-316X
Thomas M PolasekCMAX Clinical Research, 21 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhase 1 clinical trials involve rigorous safety monitoring to identify any adverse effects of investigational treatments. There is growing evidence that healthy volunteers recruited in these studies may differ with respect to personality traits from the general population. This, in turn, may have a significant impact on the reporting of adverse events, particularly in trials investigating psychoactive treatments, including the psychedelic substances. MAIN BODY: This analysis stems from our combined experience as investigators in phase 1 clinical trials and conveys an experiential understanding of the impact of psychological heterogeneity on study participation, reporting of adverse events and study outcomes.

conclusionParticipant variability due to psychological characteristics is regularly overlooked in phase 1 clinical trials and may significantly impact on reporting of the adverse events. In our opinion, healthy volunteers who present for these studies should not only be defined by the absence of past or current medical and psychiatric illness but also characterised by their psychological attributes.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicPersonalityDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHealthy VolunteersHumansPatient SelectionResearch DesignResearch SubjectsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsHealthy volunteersPersonalityPhase 1 clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID39026376
PMCPMC11256560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.