Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026338›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2024

Global health diplomacy in humanitarian action.

Luca Falqui, Fangfang Li, Yufeng Xue

Erratum issuedAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luca FalquiInternational Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Regional Delegation for East Asia, 3-2 Qijiayuan Diplomatic Compound 9, Jianguomen Wai Dajie, Beijing, 100600, China. lfalqui@icrc.org.
Fangfang LiInternational Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Regional Delegation for East Asia, 3-2 Qijiayuan Diplomatic Compound 9, Jianguomen Wai Dajie, Beijing, 100600, China.
Yufeng XueInternational Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Regional Delegation for East Asia, 3-2 Qijiayuan Diplomatic Compound 9, Jianguomen Wai Dajie, Beijing, 100600, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary explores the intersection of Global Health Diplomacy (GHD) and humanitarian action within Fragility, Conflict, and Violence (FCV) contexts. It aims at addressing the multifaceted challenges faced by communities living in these environments, where a convergence of multiple factors, including over 110 active armed conflicts, creates complex emergencies impact on large populations globally. This commentary holds three primary significances: 1)  it scrutinizes the profound and enduring health consequences of major humanitarian crises on last-mile populations, highlighting the pivotal role of health diplomacy for better navigating humanitarian challenges; 2) it advocates for a paradigm shift in humanitarian approaches, recognizing GHD's potential in shaping international cooperation, building consensus on inclusive global health policies, and enabling more effective interventions; 3) it underscores the operational impact of health diplomacy, both at diplomatic tables and on the frontlines of humanitarian efforts. Through real-world cases such as the cholera outbreak in Yemen and the response to Ebola outbreaks in DRC, the paper illustrates how diplomatic dialogue can impact health outcomes in fragile settings.

Indexed as

Global health diplomacyHumanitarian contextsUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID39026338
PMCPMC11264823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.