Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026281›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

The Relational Approach to Treating Self-Harm (RELATE): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial study of cognitive analytic therapy for adults who self-harm versus treatment at usual.

Peter James Taylor, Isabel Adeyemi, Katie Marlow, Sarah Cottam, Zerena Airnes, Samantha Hartley, Victoria Howells, Barnaby D Dunn, Rachel A Elliott, Mark Hann and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Peter James TaylorDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK. peter.taylor-2@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1407-0985
Isabel AdeyemiGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Katie MarlowRotherham, Doncaster, and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK.
Sarah CottamGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Zerena AirnesGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Samantha HartleyPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Victoria HowellsRotherham, Doncaster, and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK.
Barnaby D DunnMood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rachel A ElliottDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Mark HannDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Cameron LathamDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Catherine RobinsonDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Clive TurpinGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Stephen KellettRotherham, Doncaster, and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK.

Funding

Research for Patient Benefit Programme NIHR203515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm is a prevalent behaviour that has a major detrimental impact on a person's life. Psychological therapies have the potential to help, but evidence of effective interventions remains limited. Access and acceptability of interventions can also be a significant challenge, with individuals either being unable to access help or having to endure long waiting lists. Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) is a time-limited and relationally-focused psychotherapy that may provide a valuable treatment option for people who self-harm. This protocol outlines the methodology for the first feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CAT for adults that self-harm. The trial will aim to determine the feasibility, acceptability and safety of undertaking larger-scale evaluations of CAT for self-harm within an RCT context.

methodAn RCT design with 1:1 allocation to CAT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Participants will be adult outpatients with three or more instances of self-harm in the past year (target sample of n = 60). CAT will be 8 one-to-one weekly 60-min sessions plus a follow-up session up to 8 weeks after the last session. Assessments will occur at baseline, 12 weeks and 18 weeks after randomisation. Qualitative interviews with participants will gain insights into the feasibility and acceptability of CAT. Feasibility outcomes will be judged against progression criteria. DISCUSSION: CAT may be an effective and accessible treatment option for people who self-harm, providing a more relationally orientated alternative to more behavioural therapies. The proposed feasibility RCT is an important first step in evaluating CAT as a treatment for self-harm.

trial registrationThe trial was pre-registered (21/10/22) on ISR CTN (ISRCTN code: ISRCTN75661422).

Indexed as

Clinical trialCognitive analytic therapyFeasibilityRCTSelf-harm

Identifiers

PMID39026281
PMCPMC11256374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.