Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2024
Fenofibrate's impact on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes: a nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study.
Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fenofibrate attenuates hyperhomocysteinemia-potentiated thrombosis by restoring platelet fatty acid β-oxidation.Redox biology · 2026Article
- Managing remnant cholesterol: role of fenofibrate-statin therapy in reducing triglyceride-rich lipoproteins.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Dyslipidemia in Diabetes: Navigating a Complex Landscape for Improved Cardiovascular Outcomes.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Atorvastatin/Fenofibrate Versus Atorvastatin on the Lipid Profile of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Dyslipidemia.Cardiology and therapy · 2025Article
- The prevention opportunities of retinopathy in diabetic patients - position paper endorsed by the Polish Lipid Association.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe beneficial effects of fenofibrate on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes in patients with diabetes and statin treatment are unclear. We investigated the effects of fenofibrate on all-cause mortality and ASCVD in patients with diabetes, high triglyceride (TG) levels and statin treatment.
methodsWe performed a nationwide propensity-score matched (1:1) cohort study using data from the National Health Information Database in the Republic of Korea from 2010 to 2017. The study included 110,723 individuals with diabetes, TG levels ≥ 150 mg/dL, and no prior diagnoses of ASCVD who used statins and fenofibrate, and an equal matched number of similar patients who used statins alone (control group). The study outcomes included newly diagnosed myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, both (MI and/or stroke), and all-cause mortality.
resultsOver a mean 4.03-year follow-up period, the hazard ratios (HR) for outcomes in the fenofibrate group in comparison to the control group were 0.878 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.827-0.933] for MI, 0.901 (95% CI 0.848-0.957) for stroke, 0.897 (95% CI 0.858-0.937) for MI and/or stroke, and 0.716 (95% CI 0.685-0.749) for all-cause death. These beneficial effects of fenofibrate were consistent in the subgroup with TG 150-199 mg/dL but differed according to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.
conclusionIn this nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study involving individuals with diabetes and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL, the risk of all-cause death and ASCVD was significantly lower with fenofibrate use in conjunction with statin treatment compared to statin treatment alone. However, this finding was significant only in individuals with relatively high LDL-C levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.