Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026112›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

The swallowing and speech after transoral robotic surgery-does the site impact the outcome?

Bassem Mettias, Kate Young, Bindy Sahota, Shaji Mansuri, Anand Kumar, Hazem Nijim, David Laugharne, Sean Mortimore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bassem MettiasDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Basildon Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation trust - Nether Mayne, Basildon, SS16 5NL, UK. bassemadeldawoud@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-0465
Kate YoungSpeech and Language Therapist and Head and Neck Department, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
Bindy SahotaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
Shaji MansuriDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
Anand KumarDepartment of Maxillofacial and Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
Hazem NijimDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
David LaugharneDepartment of Maxillofacial and Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
Sean MortimoreDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been introduced to head and neck surgery as a minimally invasive techqniques to improve the functional outcomes of patients. Compare the functional outcome for swallowing and speech in each site of TORS within the head and neck. Retrospective cohort study for patients who underwent TORS within the head and neck unit. Patients were assessed at four different time points (one day, one month, six months and twelve months, respectively) with bedside/office testing. Methods of testing for swallowing assessment were by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI), and speech assessments were carried out using the Understandability of Speech score (USS). Outcomes were compared to patient-specific pre-treatment baseline levels. 68 patients were included. 75% and 40% of the patients resumed normal fluid intake and normal diet immediately after surgery. 8.8% required a temporary feeding tube, with 1% required gastrostomy. There was a steep improvement in diet between 3 and 6 months. Fluid and diet consistency dropped significantly following the majority of transoral robotic surgery with more noticeable diet changes. Early deterioration in diet is temporary and manageable with a modified diet. Rapid recovery of swallowing is achieved before the first year. There is no long-term effect on speech.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpeechAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouthRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFunctionHead and neckRoboticSpeechSwallow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.