ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
The swallowing and speech after transoral robotic surgery-does the site impact the outcome?
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing bleeding and surgical complications in transoral robotic surgery for the oropharynx: results of a global survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Investigating the requirement for nasogastric tube feeding following transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer in Oxford: a retrospective cohort study.The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been introduced to head and neck surgery as a minimally invasive techqniques to improve the functional outcomes of patients. Compare the functional outcome for swallowing and speech in each site of TORS within the head and neck. Retrospective cohort study for patients who underwent TORS within the head and neck unit. Patients were assessed at four different time points (one day, one month, six months and twelve months, respectively) with bedside/office testing. Methods of testing for swallowing assessment were by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI), and speech assessments were carried out using the Understandability of Speech score (USS). Outcomes were compared to patient-specific pre-treatment baseline levels. 68 patients were included. 75% and 40% of the patients resumed normal fluid intake and normal diet immediately after surgery. 8.8% required a temporary feeding tube, with 1% required gastrostomy. There was a steep improvement in diet between 3 and 6 months. Fluid and diet consistency dropped significantly following the majority of transoral robotic surgery with more noticeable diet changes. Early deterioration in diet is temporary and manageable with a modified diet. Rapid recovery of swallowing is achieved before the first year. There is no long-term effect on speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39026112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.