Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39026054›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024

Intracoronary imaging guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions: how and when to apply validated metrics to improve the outcome.

Francesco Prati, Flavio Giuseppe Biccirè, Simone Budassi, Riccardo Di Pietro, Mario Albertucci

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco PratiCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Via dell'Amba Aradam, 8, Rome, 00184, Italy. fprati@hsangiovanni.roma.it.
Flavio Giuseppe BiccirèCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Via dell'Amba Aradam, 8, Rome, 00184, Italy.
Simone BudassiCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Via dell'Amba Aradam, 8, Rome, 00184, Italy.
Riccardo Di PietroCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Via dell'Amba Aradam, 8, Rome, 00184, Italy.
Mario AlbertucciCardiovascular Sciences Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Via dell'Amba Aradam, 8, Rome, 00184, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still burdened by a substantial number of complications despite constant technological advances, including the advent of intracoronary imaging (ICI) techniques. ICI modalities have been instrumental for the understanding the mechanism of PCI failure. Thanks to the ability to detail the pre-intervention coronary anatomy and identify the features indicative of sub-optimal stent deployment, ICI techniques can be utilised to improve coronary interventions in different clinical scenarios. More recently large randomized clinical trials on ICI guidance confirmed the clinical effectiveness of this approach especially in complex high-risk interventions.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsStentsCoronary AngiographyHumansRadiography, InterventionalReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalCoronary artery diseaseIntracoronary imagingPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.