ArticleMolecular biotechnology2025
Development and Validation of an Immune Prognostic Index Related to Infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells in Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LFA-1/ICAM-1 Interactions Between CD8Cells · 2025Article
- The single-cell spatial landscape of stage III colorectal cancers.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly prevalent cancer worldwide, but treatment outcomes can vary significantly among patients with similar clinical or historical stages. This study aimed to investigate the differences in immune cell abundance associated with malignant progression in CRC patients. We utilized data from patients with CRC obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas as our training set. To assess immune cell infiltration levels, an immune cell risk score (ICRS) was calculated. Furthermore, we performed network analysis to identify effective T cell-related genes (ETRGs) and subsequently constructed an effective T cell prognostic index (ETPI). The performance of the ETPI was evaluated through external validation using four Gene Expression Omnibus datasets. Additionally, a nomogram analysis and drug sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore the clinical utility of the ETRGs. We also examined the expression of ETRGs in clinical samples. Based on the ICRS, we identified activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as protective factors in terms of prognosis. Six ETRGs were identified to develop the ETPI, which exhibited remarkable prognostic performance. In the external validation of immunotherapy, the low ETPI group demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate. To optimize therapeutic strategies, we developed a nomogram. Notably, patients with different ETPI values exhibited varying responses to tumor pathway inhibitors. Finally, we observed higher protein expression of certain ETRGs in normal tissues compared to tumors. Our findings suggest that the ETPI may contribute to the precise selection of patients based on tumor microenvironment and key genomic landscape interactions, thereby optimizing drug benefits and informing clinical strategies in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39026041What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.