ArticleScientific reports2024
Application of untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to routine analysis of food using three-dimensional bucketing and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding complex analytical data by a supervised correlation coefficient obtained from random forest.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Classification of Apples (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Detection of Sugar Syrups in Honey Using Untargeted Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Chemometrics.Metabolites · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the detection of food adulteration, sensitive and reproducible analytical methods are required. Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) is a highly sensitive method that can be used to obtain analytical fingerprints consisting of a variety of different components. Since the comparability of measurements carried out with different devices and at different times is not given, specific adulterants are usually detected in targeted analyses instead of analyzing the entire fingerprint. However, this comprehensive analysis is desirable in order to stay ahead in the race against food fraudsters, who are constantly adapting their adulterations to the latest state of the art in analytics. We have developed and optimized an approach that enables the separate processing of untargeted LC‑HRMS data obtained from different devices and at different times. We demonstrate this by the successful determination of the geographical origin of honey samples using a random forest model. We then show that this approach can be applied to develop a continuously learning classification model and our final model, based on data from 835 samples, achieves a classification accuracy of 94% for 126 test samples from 6 different countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.