Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39025974›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Glottic insufficiency caused by vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus: systematic review of outcome measurements.

Emke M J M van den Broek, Stephanie D Mes, Bas J Heijnen, Antonius P M Langeveld, Peter Paul G van Benthem, Elisabeth V Sjögren

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emke M J M van den BroekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. E.M.J.M.van_den_Broek@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6217-3044
Stephanie D MesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bas J HeijnenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Antonius P M LangeveldDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter Paul G van BenthemDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth V SjögrenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdentifying outcome measurements instruments (OMIs) to evaluate treatment efficacy in patients with vocal fold atrophy and/or sulcus.

methodsSystematic review of records published before March 2021 by searching Pubmed and EMBASE. Included studies reported on adults (> 18 year) with dysphonia caused by glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus, who were enrolled into a randomized controlled trial, a non-randomized controlled trial, a case-controlled study or a cohort study. All included studies described an intervention with at least one outcome measurement.

resultsA total of 5456 studies were identified. After removing duplicates, screening title and abstract and full text screening of selected records, 34 publications were included in final analysis. From these 50 separate OMIs were recorded and categorized according to the ELS protocol by DeJonckere et al. (Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258: 77-82, 2001). With most OMIs being used in multiple studies the total number of OMIs reported was 265. Nineteen (19) individual OMIs accounted for 80% of reports. The most frequently used OMIs according to category were: VHI and VHI-10 (subjective evaluation); G of GRBAS (perceptual evaluation); F0, Jitter and Shimmer (acoustic evaluation); MPT and MFR (aerodynamic evaluation) and glottic closure and mucosal wave (endoscopic evaluation). Of these OMIs VHI had a high percentage of significance of 90%.

conclusionThis systematic review identifies the most used OMIs in patients with glottic incompetency due to vocal fold atrophy and/or sulcus as a step toward defining a Core Outcome Set (COS) for this population. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: 238274.

Indexed as

AtrophyDysphoniaGlottisVocal CordsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareVoice QualityCore Outcome SetGlottic insufficiencyOutcome measuresScarSulcusSystematic reviewTreatment outcomesVocal fold atrophy

Identifiers

PMID39025974
PMCPMC11416396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.